![]() I'm also 100 percent sure that it uses much more GRIB formatted data than Opus does (because this amount of data simply can't be downloaded to a client in the speed that Opus does it) and FSGRW does not make any sophisticated calculations on the client (that's why we have the cloud-based technology). ![]() However, I don't wanna start this "hick-hack" discussion, just one sentence: The cited text is just wrong! FSGRW does use a lot of data in GRIB format (including, but not limited to winds and temps aloft). Not the most friendly marketing strategy to say something so terribly wrong about a competitor on the market. I personally hate these kind of conversations and wanted to avoid them from day one: I never lost a bad word about Opus or pretended to know more about their engine than I actually do. Sorry, but whoever wrote this does certainly not know what FSGRW does or what GRIB actually is (it's a data format, nothing more).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |